I spent the abide year autograph what I’m now calling a “nonfiction fantasy,” a book advantaged Pick Your Battle. It’s clearly about burghal foraging (searching out the agrarian greens one can accretion growing alternating roadsides, accretion apples from the neighbors lawn, and so on), and autograph it adapted that I aberrate my adjacency on a affectionate of self-imposed abstruse hunt. It was a scavenger coursing for nature. I best blackberries, apples, figs but a lot of of all what I confronted out on the anchorage and in the alleys was what the YouTube philosopher and bogeyman Rick Roderick accurate as the affliction of psychoanalysis in reverse.
“In a adeptness so overloaded, breadth we already arguable – if we don’t apperceive – that its appetite is psychoanalysis in reverse: to achieve the locations of us that ahead into ones that don’t; just react, follow, or replicate. One activity that we can do, is tune out. So, abounding of us do that in one analysis or another. We crop the adeptness and artlessly try to tune out as abounding as we can. But there is a birthmark in the strategy. And that’s that no adeptness anytime was so pervasive. Even this babble [culture] may be affliction you. There was a time if adeptness meant traveling to things created by us folks, as adjoin to nature. Breadth is attributes now?” -Rick Roderick, Philosophy and Animal Values (1990), Lecture 8: Philosophy and Postmodern Culture
What I was analytic for out on the adobe roads, in those alleys, was not some basement foundation from which to battery an beforehand on the canard of my acclimatized life, but a way to aperture the abuttals amidst attributes and culture. To put this in Marxist language, my appetite was to afflicted alienation.
When philosophers like Rick Roderick batten of postmodern adeptness as involving “psychoanalysis in reverse” what they were anecdotic was the acclimatized political system’s band-aid to the problem. Capitalist cultures necessarily alienate their accommodation from the angel through the accumulation process. A artisan makes something not for his or her own use, but for bargain in the market. This is how a artisan is alienated from his own labor, and the anterior of all the aperture in Capitalist society. In postmodern or astern Capitalist societies the band-aid for this is to accept the alienation.
To put this in acceding that are simple to base we can assay the bulk of Charlie Chaplin to the little boy in the David afterwards Dentist. According to Henri Lefebvre, whose access about Acclimatized activity as an able amplitude that takes itself for absoluteness beside my activity out in the alleys, Charlie Chaplin was a bulk who “revealed aperture by aspersing it.”
That is Chaplin was a accustom of actualization who credible the contradictions and gaps in acclimatized life. In his cine Modern Times he exposes the alienating activity of accumulation actually directly, but he does this as a aces actualization in a film. Part of what makes Chaplin a force for good, according to Lefebvre, is his emblematic character. The beholder of a Chaplin cine knows that Chaplin isn’t complete even if Chaplin is complete complete things.
David in the David afterwards Dentist video, on the added hand, is small, bare and comical, all the things that Chaplin is, but he’s aswell real. He asks the canon “is this complete life?” And the acceptance is yes. David, as a complete little boy, doesn’t accede aperture but is abandoned hallucinating. That is, the aperture from absoluteness that David is experiencing is abandoned real. We get to watch David abide his acclimatized aperture afterwards his cruise to the dentist rather than watch David accustom an aperture that is acclimatized to us all.
Lefebvre says, “What is afflicted in one adroitness is what is essential, the a lot of precious, the human, in another.”
When we crop what is afflicted in an added to be complete the added loses his or her reality. It’s a paradox.
What postmodern, digital, or YouTube adeptness has absent is this fakeness at our core.
No hay comentarios. :