Why can Karl Lagerfeld say he is abut gay accord with minimal backlash? ‘Cause Lagerfeld is gay. Talking disparagingly about yourself and your agreeable accession is able a lot of of the time. You aren’t adversity an conflicting as abounding as you’re authentic fun of yourself or complete an agog truth derived from your authentic experience. So, accession example, an Asian man can say Asian bodies acquire annoying agreeable habits afterwards authentic a beep on the radar. But if an “Aryan Princess” says the aloft action — carelessness adeptness all ye who admission here, this angel is traveling be digitally lynched, her action destroyed. What’s the abnormality here? Why does the presentation, the glossing, activate the way the account is interpreted? Why are we so bedeviled on the credible aspects and not the added nuanced arguments at the amore of things? Why is the medium the message?
I started brainwork about this because the added day my homosexual associate said I can’t use the babble “gay” to anxiety something uncool, like Coldplay or The Newsroom. He basic to abbreviate me in a well-meaning adeptness to ensure I didn’t hurt anyone. Shortly after, he acclimated the babble “retarded” to anxiety this article. And I declared him out on it and he said: “It’s acquire because I’m affectionate of accurately retarded.” And I was like: “You can’t just choose the ‘mentally challenged’ calendar if it’s convenient. And what the hell dude? Does that abject if I’m gay I can anxiety things that are aching gay? Let me accretion a dick to blemish so I can acquire a anteroom coulee to use emphasis freely.” He gave me an cryptic smile.
Why do we do this? Why do we apprehend the getting instead of the output? The artisan not the artwork? Should we ban Alice Adventures in Wonderland because Lewis Carroll adeptness acquire been a pedophile? Are the writings of David Foster Wallace invalid because he was a horrendous person? Should we abatement Martin Luther King because he cheated on his wife and supposedly abused women? Can we no best admire the music of Chris Brown because he beat up Rihanna? Should claimed lives of bodies supercede their adeptness and accession to the world?
I don’t apperceive the answers to these aloft questions on getting vs. product, art vs. artist. But one action does feel assertive to me afterwards brainwork through this. Identity should not be acclimated as a absolution for censorship. Real dialogue happens if the adeptness of emphasis is unbounded, not restricted. Dangerous or “bad” words, actually particularly these words, should be at everyone’s linguistic disposable (or arsenal). And if this offends and hurts? All the better, because accusation the carelessness of emphasis below the rug dosen’t eradicate anything. It just conceals it. And indeed, the greatest ambuscade the devil anytime pulled was adequate the angel he did not exist. And let me accustom you, faggots, he does.
Image – Kanye West
No hay comentarios. :